Even good old RFK Jr. is not going to help us. None of them are. Wake up.
Left Right Dichotomy = Both Wings of Moloch (The Tranny Goat worshipped by the Jews)
As Above So Below
Left Wing = Hand Down (Democrats)
Right Wing = Hand Up (Republicans)
Democrat Party is a terrorist organisation funded by George Soros (Executed)
***
Conservatism 101: What You Need to Know
A FEW words are in order here about the canard that this is a free country with plenty of competing ideas and opinions, as in liberal versus conservative, Left vs. Right, Democrat vs. Republican.
This distracting soap opera has been playing for a long time, and I’m hardly the first one to point it out. Way back in 1968, third party presidential candidate George Wallace famously quipped that “there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican parties.” And much further back still, Ernest Everhard, the hero of Jack London’s The Iron Heel, confronted Congress in one scene with these words: “There are no Republicans nor Democrats in this House. You are lick-spittlers and panderers, the creatures of the Plutocracy.” As the French proverb goes, the more things change, the more they remain the same.
Although these distinctions have become irrelevant, I occasionally use the terms “Left” and “liberal” as they’re commonly understood, but “conservative” no longer means anything to me.
I write these words as one who used to proudly called himself a “staunch conservative,” but many years ago came to see that conservatism is a bowl of mush, a synonym for stupidity, hypocrisy, and cowardice. There was a time when the word really meant something, when it meant defending and conserving everything precious in Western civilization that has come down through the ages.
Genuine conservatism was exemplified by Charles Lindbergh. An intensely private man of sterling character who loathed the press, Lindbergh nevertheless went public in alerting his countrymen to the danger of Jewish influence in the newspaper and film industry, as I’ve written elsewhere, and he also warned of the terrible squandering of the White race’s best genes that would inevitably result from another world war. The issues Lindbergh raised in his speeches and in his wartime diary, which later was published in book form, are as fundamental as ever, but no self-styled conservative since 1945 has dared to bring them up. To do so would be career suicide in a country where media executives determine the boundaries of permissible speech and opinion, beyond which those of all political stripes know not to stray. Lindbergh himself was relegated to near non-existence after the war because of his views. World War Two, a cataclysm for every nation involved, has become the bedrock of lies on which the modern world teeters, yet our hollow military victory in that terrible conflict, which brought Communism to half of Europe as well as China and Korea, is considered a glorious triumph of good over evil by all respectable conservatives.
In our times, Ron Paul, the former Texas congressman — and incidentally, a retired obstetrician who favors parental freedom of choice on vaccination — has been the only public figure I can think of who espouses the conservatism embodied in the men who created America. As principled a man as Paul is, however, he has always avoided the core issues of race and Jewish power. His integrity was rewarded by media obscurity, in addition to Republican Party dirty tricks that nullified his presidential ambitions in 2008 and again in 2012.
Pat Buchanan is the grand old man of American conservatism; many would agree that he’s the best that conservatism can offer. This professional chameleon deserves mention only because he has been around forever and has occasionally made sense, at times in the past even angering media bosses and milquetoast conservatives with mild criticism of the Zionist lobby and our endless futile wars. But he’s an old hand at switching sides, and has always landed back on safe ground in the Establishment camp, having a string of books on the New York Times bestseller list to show for it — the hallmark of every well-known conservative, and the reward for playing the game. This is what one would expect of an insider who worked for Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan in their presidential years — both of whom wore a conservative hat but never did one thing to put their country on the right track. Nixon was nothing more than an ambitious and pragmatic politician, while Reagan was a basically nice man but totally lacking in substance, a Hollywood actor who played his conservative role to the hilt. What Buchanan offers is a kind of schizophrenic conservatism. Quoting from his writings many years ago, independent researcher Michael Hoffman showed that Buchanan has an ingrained habit of…
Read more:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/07/conservatism-101-what-you-need-to-know/
